How We Engineer

Standards-based analysis, rigorous QA, comprehensive documentation

A disciplined engineering process that makes every AES deliverable defensible, constructable, and maintainable — from kickoff to closeout.

Engineering Philosophy

The principles we engineer by

Three non-negotiable values that shape every study, drawing, and recommendation we issue.

Principle 01

Defensible Engineering

Every calculation, assumption, and recommendation is traceable to a code, standard, or published methodology — and documented so it holds up under audit.

Principle 02

Risk & Responsibility

We accept stewardship of the electrical decisions we seal. That means owning the coordination, the conservatism, and the conversation with the AHJ.

Principle 03

Lifecycle Thinking

Designs and studies are built for the facility's operating lifetime — not just the ribbon-cutting. Future-loads, spares, maintainability, and NFPA 70B factor in from day one.

Standards & Compliance

Grounded in the codes that matter

Every engagement is tested against the applicable codes, AHJ expectations, and facility-specific standards.

Primary Electrical Codes
  • NFPA 70 (NEC)
  • NFPA 70B (2023)
  • NFPA 70E
  • IEEE 1584
  • IEEE 242
  • ANSI/IEEE C37 Series
Authority & Coordination
  • AHJ Coordination
  • Utility Interconnection
  • State / Municipal Amendments
  • Facility-Specific Standards
Quality Assurance

Our 3-step QA process

Independent review and constructability vetting before any deliverable leaves the office.

1

Independent Technical Review

A second licensed PE reviews the model, assumptions, and deliverables before issue.

2

Standards Compliance Check

Cross-reference against NEC, NFPA 70B/70E, IEEE 1584/242, and owner-specific standards.

3

Constructability Assessment

Field-calibrated review of feasibility, coordination with other trades, and maintainability.

Engineer reviewing facility blueprints
Deliverables & Communication

Documentation that lasts

AES deliverables are written for owners, operators, and regulators — clear, traceable, and ready to live in the facility binder.

  • Study Reports (PE-sealed)
  • Single-Line & System Diagrams
  • Equipment Specifications
  • Compliance & Label Documentation
Typical Project Timeline

A 6-week rhythm for study-scale engagements

Actual durations vary with scope and facility access — but this is the operating cadence our owners know us by.

  1. 1

    Project Initiation

    Day 1-3

    Scope confirmation, kickoff call, and data-request package issued.

  2. 2

    Information Gathering

    Week 1-2

    Equipment data, one-line drawings, utility data, and site walkdowns.

  3. 3

    Analysis & Engineering

    Week 2-4

    Model build in ETAP/SKM, internal QA/QC review, and findings drafted.

  4. 4

    Deliverable Preparation

    Week 4-5

    Report writing, PE seal, label packages, and owner-ready documentation.

  5. 5

    Client Review & Finalization

    Week 5-6

    Review workshop, owner comments incorporated, and final sealed issue.